Peak torque
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE72.6 Nm54.6 Nm higher
SteadyWin GIM6010-3618 Nm
Part comparison
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE vs SteadyWin GIM6010-36
7 shared specs
ROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REQC080-240-R020-REVS
SteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-36GIM6010-36Specifications
6 specifications compared side by side.
| Compare bySpecification | AROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE | BSteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-36 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance1 | ||
| Peak torque | 72.6 Nm54.6 Nm higher | 18 Nm |
| Mechanical & integration5 | ||
| Motor kind | QDD | QDD actuator |
| Drive principle | PMSM | BLDC/PMSM |
| Gear ratio | 20:1 | 36:1 |
| QDD | Yes | Yes |
| Integrated driver | Yes | Yes |
AROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE
BSteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-36
Performance1
Mechanical & integration5
Motor kind
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REQDD
SteadyWin GIM6010-36QDD actuator
Drive principle
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REPMSM
SteadyWin GIM6010-36BLDC/PMSM
Gear ratio
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE20:1
SteadyWin GIM6010-3636:1
QDD
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REYes
SteadyWin GIM6010-36Yes
Integrated driver
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REYes
SteadyWin GIM6010-36Yes
Product sources
Product sources used by this comparison
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REOpen source ↗
SteadyWin GIM6010-36Open source ↗