Part comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE vs LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2

9 shared specs
ROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REQC080-240-R020-RE
View details
VS
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2MG8010E-i36 V2
View details

Specifications

8 specifications compared side by side.

AROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE
BLKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2

Physical1

Weight
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE845 g15 g lower
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2860 g

Performance1

Peak torque
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE72.6 Nm27.6 Nm higher
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V245 Nm

Mechanical & integration5

Motor kind
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REQDD
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2QDD actuator
Drive principle
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REPMSM
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2BLDC/PMSM
Gear ratio
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-RE20:1
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V236:1
QDD
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REYes
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2Yes
Integrated driver
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REYes
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2Yes

Control & communication1

Encoder
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REintegrated
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2dual magnetic

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC080-240-R020-REOpen source
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2Open source