Part comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE vs SteadyWin GIM6010-8

9 shared specs
ROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REQC060-200-R020-RE
View details
VS
SteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8GIM6010-8
View details

Specifications

8 specifications compared side by side.

AROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE
BSteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8

Physical1

Weight
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE435 g
SteadyWin GIM6010-8388 g47 g lower

Performance1

Peak torque
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE30 Nm19 Nm higher
SteadyWin GIM6010-811 Nm

Electrical1

Nominal voltage
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE48 V
SteadyWin GIM6010-824 V

Mechanical & integration5

Motor kind
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REQDD
SteadyWin GIM6010-8QDD actuator
Drive principle
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REPMSM
SteadyWin GIM6010-8BLDC/PMSM
Gear ratio
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE20:1
SteadyWin GIM6010-88:1
QDD
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REYes
SteadyWin GIM6010-8Yes
Integrated driver
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REYes
SteadyWin GIM6010-8Yes

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REOpen source
SteadyWin GIM6010-8Open source