Part comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE vs LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder

9 shared specs
ROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REQC060-200-R020-RE
View details
VS
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderMG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
View details

Specifications

8 specifications compared side by side.

AROBOTISDYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE
BLKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder

Physical1

Weight
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE435 g
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder343 g92 g lower

Performance1

Peak torque
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE30 Nm20 Nm higher
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder10 Nm

Mechanical & integration5

Motor kind
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REQDD
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderQDD actuator
Drive principle
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REPMSM
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderBLDC/PMSM
Gear ratio
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-RE20:1
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder6:1
QDD
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REYes
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderYes
Integrated driver
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REYes
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderYes

Control & communication1

Encoder
DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REintegrated
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderdual magnetic

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

DYNAMIXEL-Q QC060-200-R020-REOpen source
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderOpen source