Part comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuator vs SteadyWin GIM6010-8

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

15 shared specs4 scored
No imageCubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuatorRO100
View details
VS
SteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8GIM6010-8
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 4 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

2

Tied

0

Part B leads

2

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

14 specifications compared side by side.

ACubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuator
BSteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8

Physical1

Weight
Part A710 g
Part B388 g322 g lower

Performance3

Rated torque
Part A4 Nm
Part B5 Nm1 Nm higher
Peak torque
Part A12 Nm1 Nm higher
Part B11 Nm
Rated speed
Part A2000 rpm1,880 rpm higher
Part B120 rpm

Electrical1

Nominal voltageUse-dependent
Part A48 V
Part B24 V

Mechanical & integration7

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear typeUse-dependent
Part Adirect
Part Bplanetary
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes

Control & communication2

Communication interfacesUse-dependent
Part ACAN
Part BCAN;PWM
Control modesUse-dependent
Part AMIT;servo
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuatorOpen source
SteadyWin GIM6010-8Open source