Part comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100 vs SteadyWin GIM6010-8

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

17 shared specs4 scored
No imageCubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100AK80-9
View details
VS
SteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8GIM6010-8
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 4 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

3

Tied

0

Part B leads

1

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

15 specifications compared side by side.

ACubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100
BSteadyWinSteadyWin GIM6010-8

Physical1

Weight
Part A485 g
Part B388 g97 g lower

Performance3

Rated torque
Part A9 Nm4 Nm higher
Part B5 Nm
Peak torque
Part A22 Nm11 Nm higher
Part B11 Nm
Rated speed
Part A390 rpm270 rpm higher
Part B120 rpm

Electrical1

Nominal voltageUse-dependent
Part A48 V
Part B24 V

Mechanical & integration8

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear type
Part Aplanetary
Part Bplanetary
Gear ratioUse-dependent
Part A9:1
Part B8:1
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes

Control & communication2

Communication interfacesUse-dependent
Part ACAN;UART
Part BCAN;PWM
Control modesUse-dependent
Part AMIT;servo
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100Open source
SteadyWin GIM6010-8Open source