Part comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100 vs LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

16 shared specs3 scored
No imageCubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100AK80-9
View details
VS
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderMG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 3 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

2

Tied

0

Part B leads

1

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

14 specifications compared side by side.

ACubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100
BLKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder

Physical1

Weight
Part A485 g
Part B343 g142 g lower

Performance2

Rated torque
Part A9 Nm4 Nm higher
Part B5 Nm
Peak torque
Part A22 Nm12 Nm higher
Part B10 Nm

Mechanical & integration8

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear type
Part Aplanetary
Part Bplanetary
Gear ratioUse-dependent
Part A9:1
Part B6:1
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes

Control & communication3

EncoderUse-dependent
Part Amagnetic
Part Bdual magnetic
Communication interfacesUse-dependent
Part ACAN;UART
Part BCAN
Control modesUse-dependent
Part AMIT;servo
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor AK80-9 V3.0 KV100Open source
LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderOpen source