Part comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuator vs Unitree GO-M8010-6 Go1/Go2 motor

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

13 shared specs2 scored
No imageCubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuatorRO100
View details
VS
Unitree RoboticsUnitree GO-M8010-6 Go1/Go2 motorGO-M8010-6
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 2 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

0

Tied

0

Part B leads

2

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

12 specifications compared side by side.

ACubeMars / T-MotorCubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuator
BUnitree RoboticsUnitree GO-M8010-6 Go1/Go2 motor

Physical1

Weight
Part A710 g
Part B530 g180 g lower

Performance1

Peak torque
Part A12 Nm
Part B23.7 Nm11.7 Nm higher

Electrical1

Nominal voltageUse-dependent
Part A48 V
Part B24 V

Mechanical & integration7

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear typeUse-dependent
Part Adirect
Part Bplanetary
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes

Control & communication2

Communication interfacesUse-dependent
Part ACAN
Part BRS485
Control modesUse-dependent
Part AMIT;servo
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

CubeMars / T-Motor RO100 robotic actuatorOpen source
Unitree GO-M8010-6 Go1/Go2 motorOpen source