Part comparison

LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2 vs mjbots qdd100 beta 3

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

17 shared specs3 scored
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2MG8010E-i36 V2
View details
VS
mjbotsmjbots qdd100 beta 3qdd100 beta 3
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 3 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

3

Tied

0

Part B leads

0

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

16 specifications compared side by side.

ALKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2
Bmjbotsmjbots qdd100 beta 3

Performance2

Rated torque
Part A35 Nm25 Nm higher
Part B10 Nm
Peak torque
Part A45 Nm29 Nm higher
Part B16 Nm

Electrical3

Minimum voltageUse-dependent
Part A12 V
Part B10 V
Maximum voltageUse-dependent
Part A60 V
Part B44 V
Peak power
Part A800 W300 W higher
Part B500 W

Mechanical & integration8

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear typeUse-dependent
Part Aplanetary
Part BDirect or low ratio
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes
Recommended joint use
Part Arobot joint
Part Brobot joint

Control & communication3

EncoderUse-dependent
Part Adual magnetic
Part Bmagnetic
Communication interfaces
Part ACAN
Part BCAN
Control modes
Part Aposition;velocity;torque
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2Open source
mjbots qdd100 beta 3Open source