Part comparison

LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder vs mjbots qdd100 beta 3

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

15 shared specs3 scored
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderMG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
View details
VS
mjbotsmjbots qdd100 beta 3qdd100 beta 3
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 3 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

0

Tied

0

Part B leads

3

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

14 specifications compared side by side.

ALKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
Bmjbotsmjbots qdd100 beta 3

Performance2

Rated torque
Part A5 Nm
Part B10 Nm5 Nm higher
Peak torque
Part A10 Nm
Part B16 Nm6 Nm higher

Mechanical & integration8

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear typeUse-dependent
Part Aplanetary
Part BDirect or low ratio
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes
Recommended joint use
Part Arobot joint
Part Brobot joint

Control & communication3

EncoderUse-dependent
Part Adual magnetic
Part Bmagnetic
Communication interfaces
Part ACAN
Part BCAN
Control modes
Part Aposition;velocity;torque
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Other specifications1

CAN bitrate
Part A2 Mbps
Part B5 Mbps3 Mbps higher

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderOpen source
mjbots qdd100 beta 3Open source