Part comparison

LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder vs LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

19 shared specs5 scored
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderMG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
View details
VS
LKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2MG8010E-i36 V2
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 5 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

1

Tied

2

Part B leads

2

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

16 specifications compared side by side.

ALKMTECHLKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoder
BLKMTECHLKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2

Physical1

Weight
Part A343 g517 g lower
Part B860 g

Performance2

Rated torque
Part A5 Nm
Part B35 Nm30 Nm higher
Peak torque
Part A10 Nm
Part B45 Nm35 Nm higher

Mechanical & integration9

Motor kind
Part AQDD actuator
Part BQDD actuator
Drive principle
Part ABLDC/PMSM
Part BBLDC/PMSM
Architecture
Part AIntegrated motor reducer driver
Part BIntegrated motor reducer driver
Gear type
Part Aplanetary
Part Bplanetary
Gear ratioUse-dependent
Part A6:1
Part B36:1
QDD
Part AYes
Part BYes
Backdrivable
Part AYes
Part BYes
Integrated driver
Part AYes
Part BYes
Recommended joint use
Part Arobot joint
Part Brobot joint

Control & communication4

Encoder
Part Adual magnetic
Part Bdual magnetic
Encoder count
Part A2
Part B2
Communication interfaces
Part ACAN
Part BCAN
Control modes
Part Aposition;velocity;torque
Part Bposition;velocity;torque

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

LKMTECH MG6010-i6 V3 dual encoderOpen source
LKMTECH MG8010E-i36 V2Open source