Part comparison

Blue Bird BMS-35A vs Hitec DB961WP

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

11 shared specs3 scored
No imageBlue BirdBlue Bird BMS-35ABMS-35A
View details
VS
HitecHitec DB961WPDB961WP
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 3 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

1

Tied

0

Part B leads

2

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

11 specifications compared side by side.

ABlue BirdBlue Bird BMS-35A
BHitecHitec DB961WP

Performance3

Stall torque
Part A3.481 Nm
Part B5.394 Nm1.913 Nm higher
Stall torque @ 7.4V
Part A35.5 kg·cm
Part B55 kg·cm19.5 kg·cm higher
Speed @ 7.4V
Part A0.14 s/60°0.01 s/60° lower
Part B0.15 s/60°

Mechanical & integration4

Motor kind
Part ARc servo
Part BRc servo
Drive principle
Part Aservo actuator
Part Bservo actuator
ArchitectureUse-dependent
Part AIntegrated servo module
Part BRc servo module
Gear materialUse-dependent
Part Atitanium
Part BSteel Steel

Control & communication3

Communication interfaces
Part APWM
Part BPWM
Control modes
Part APWM servo
Part BPWM servo
Servo signal
Part APWM
Part BPWM

Other specifications1

PWM pulse center
Part A1500 µs
Part B1500 µs

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

Blue Bird BMS-35AOpen source
Hitec DB961WPNo public source