Part comparison

Blue Bird BMS-35A vs Futaba BLS172SV

A side-by-side comparison of source-backed specifications within the same subcategory.

11 shared specs2 scored
No imageBlue BirdBlue Bird BMS-35ABMS-35A
View details
VS
FutabaFutaba BLS172SVBLS172SV
View details

Directional spec summary

Counts across 2 numeric specifications with a clear higher-or-lower direction.

Part A leads

0

Tied

1

Part B leads

1

These are metric-by-metric differences, not an overall performance score. Check the values below.

Specifications

11 specifications compared side by side.

ABlue BirdBlue Bird BMS-35A
BFutabaFutaba BLS172SV

Physical1

Weight
Part A74 g
Part B74 g

Performance1

Stall torque
Part A3.481 Nm
Part B3.628 Nm0.147 Nm higher

Electrical2

Minimum voltageUse-dependent
Part A6 V
Part B6.6 V
Maximum voltage
Part A7.4 V
Part B7.4 V

Mechanical & integration3

Motor kind
Part ARc servo
Part BRc servo
Drive principle
Part Aservo actuator
Part Bservo actuator
Architecture
Part AIntegrated servo module
Part BIntegrated servo module

Control & communication3

Communication interfacesUse-dependent
Part APWM
Part BPWM;S.Bus2
Control modesUse-dependent
Part APWM servo
Part BPWM/S.Bus2 servo
Servo signal
Part APWM
Part BPWM

Other specifications1

PWM pulse center
Part A1500 µs
Part B1500 µs

Product sources

Product sources used by this comparison

Blue Bird BMS-35AOpen source
Futaba BLS172SVOpen source